A touchscreen isn't a replacement for a keyboard or mouse, it's a complement. The touchscreen is a complement for mouse and keyboardWe've been looking at this all wrong. However, that assumes an awful lot - what if you're not holding your arms out in space waiting to touch things, but resting them comfortably on a keyboard? When Steve Jobs decried touchscreen laptops in 2010, he was merely relaying the common wisdom of decades of user experience research into "gorilla arm syndrome." Simply put, it's the idea that if you hold out your arm in front of a touchscreen for an extended period of time, it's not going to be particularly comfortable. I was prepared to write that the Windows 8 interface was forcing unnecessary touchscreen controls on people who wouldn't appreciate them, particularly if they were simply grafted onto a traditional laptop.īut the more I've used Windows 8, despite its faults, the more I've become convinced that touchscreens are the future - even vertical ones. I was prepared for disappointment from day one - prepared to say that while certain Windows 8 gestures are easier with a touchscreen, the overall idea isn't very good. I review laptops for The Verge, and recently I've been using a string of Windows 8 touchscreen computers.
And yet somehow, neither of them have kept me from instinctively, repeatedly touching the screen of my MacBook Air this month. These were the opinions of the leaders of the most profitable tech company in the world. "You can converge a toaster and a refrigerator, but those things are probably not gonna be pleasing to the user." That one's from Tim Cook earlier this year, explaining the company's stance on convertible tablet PCs. "Touch surfaces don't want to be vertical." That's Jobs in 2010, telling the world why Apple notebooks wouldn't feature the technology. However, some pundits have long believed that a touchscreen simply doesn't belong on a laptop. With Windows 8, touchscreens are more relevant than ever before.
0 kommentar(er)
